Useful observation notes connect the task, the relevant criterion, specific evidence of performance and your judgement. Record how well the learner performed, any assistance they received and anything you could not assess. Another assessor should be able to follow your reasoning without having witnessed the task.
By EduMark team
City & Guilds’ August 2025 practical observation guidance, written for its Technical Qualifications, recommends commentary linked to marking descriptors, with examples supporting the level awarded. It advises against a step-by-step account in favour of explaining the quality of performance, including strengths and weaknesses. ([cityandguilds.com](https://www.cityandguilds.com/-/media/cityandguilds-site/documents/technical-qualifications/practical_observation_forms_best_practice-pdf.pdf))
The approach below is adaptable, not an awarding-body form. Your qualification’s assessment instructions, marking scheme and required records take precedence.
Before the task: prepare to capture evidence
Have the relevant marking grid beside your observation record. City & Guilds recommends identifying the task clearly and using marking-band terminology to indicate performance level. Pair that terminology with evidence: writing “accurate” alone does not explain what was accurate. ([cityandguilds.com](https://www.cityandguilds.com/-/media/cityandguilds-site/documents/technical-qualifications/practical_observation_forms_best_practice-pdf.pdf))
For your own preparation:
- Identify observable requirements. What would demonstrate the criterion, and what would leave it unproven?
- Check assessment conditions. Establish permitted resources, questioning, assistance and agreed adjustments before starting.
- Leave space for exceptions. Capture omissions, corrections, interruptions and assessor interventions, not just successful actions.
- Separate evidence from interpretation. First record what happened; then explain its significance against the criterion.
A fictional customer-service role-play
In this invented practice assessment, a learner handles a complaint about a missed delivery and a paid installation that did not happen. The fictional brief requires them to confirm the complaint, independently agree a specific follow-up before closing, and refer matters outside their authority. These are illustrative criteria, not a published qualification standard.
Too vague to review
Handled the complaint well. Listened, apologised and offered a solution.
This gives an impression, but no clear basis for deciding which requirements were demonstrated or whether the learner needed help.
A more useful observation
Allowed the customer to explain without interruption. Accurately summarised both the missed delivery and the uncompleted installation, then checked that these were the two issues. Asked what outcome the customer wanted and offered two options permitted by the supplied policy.
Started closing the conversation without agreeing a follow-up time. Assessor prompted: “When will you contact the customer?” Learner then agreed a telephone update by 10 am the following day.
The corresponding judgement might read:
Confirming the complaint: met in this task; the summary covered both issues and was checked with the customer. Independent follow-up agreement: not met in this attempt; a specific time was agreed only after an assessor prompt. Referral beyond authority: not observed; neither option required escalation.
The prompt matters because this fictional criterion explicitly requires independence. Do not assume that every question or intervention has the same effect: apply the actual assessment rules.
An adaptable observation record
OCR’s guidance for verified vocational qualifications says assessment records must identify who assessed whom, what, how and when, the decision, supporting evidence location, feedback and further plans. Use those questions to check that your observation sits within a complete assessment record. ([ocr.org.uk](https://www.ocr.org.uk/administration/other-vocational-qualifications/assessment/verified-qualifications/evidence/))
Suggested header: learner and assessor identifiers; qualification, unit and task; date and setting; assessment method; criterion or marking-grid version; record reference; relevant conditions and agreed adjustments. Complete required declarations and signatures separately.
| Task | Criterion | Observed performance | Assistance | Judgement | Evidence gaps / next action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint role-play | C1: Confirm complaint | Summarised both issues correctly and checked the summary with the customer. | No assessor assistance. | Met in this task. | No gap identified for this task; check any wider evidence requirements. |
| Complaint role-play | C2: Independently agree follow-up before closing | Began closing without a time; agreed next-day contact after prompting. | Exact prompt recorded above. | Not met in this attempt. | Give feedback; arrange further assessment only as permitted. |
| Complaint role-play | C3: Refer matters beyond authority | No situation requiring referral arose. | None. | Not observed. | Plan a permitted opportunity to demonstrate referral. |
This table is a working aid, not a replacement for required documentation. OCR specifies approval arrangements for centre-designed cumulative assessment records and amendments; check the applicable requirements before adopting a local form. ([ocr.org.uk](https://www.ocr.org.uk/administration/other-vocational-qualifications/assessment/verified-qualifications/evidence/))
Distinguish “not observed” from “not met”
- Not observed: you lack evidence to judge the requirement. State why: no relevant opportunity arose, your view was obstructed, or the assessment was interrupted.
- Not met: recorded performance supports a judgement that the stated requirement was not achieved. Identify the omission or shortfall and its relationship to the criterion.
Neither label should hide uncertainty. Missing evidence does not prove inability, but it also does not justify awarding credit. Use the qualification’s required terminology and rules for incomplete evidence. Do not substitute an explanation of how to perform a skill for required practical demonstration unless explicitly permitted.
Keep the judgement connected to its evidence
Before finalising, ask a colleague to identify the evidence supporting each decision. If they must guess what “good” means or whether help was given, clarify the record rather than adding unsupported detail from memory.
EduMark Studio connects submitted work, criteria, recorded judgements and feedback for human review. This is not a claim of a dedicated observation-capture feature: establish your qualification-compliant record first, then check how it fits your configured submission and review process. ([edumark.ai](https://www.edumark.ai/marking-studio))
Sources & further reading
See how EduMark connects learning, assessment and your team.
Explore EduMark →
