Explore EduMark Practical thinking on assessment, teaching and the thoughtful use of AI. From the people building EduMark.
Bridge the gap between watching a solution and solving a problem alone. Use a checked discount example, a planning table and clear signals for restoring support.
Tell learners which AI help is allowed, what they must do independently and how to acknowledge permitted use. Includes an editable template and a fictional example.
A shared project does not tell you everything each learner knows. Plan individual explanations, evidence links and fair follow-up before the group starts work.
Rehearse your LMS move with a fictional assignment, from first submission to resubmission. Check what transfers correctly and agree what must be retained separately.
Use a live-class quick check to spot a possible learning gap, plan a short recap or practice task, then check again before moving on.
Record the decision, criteria, evidence, reviewer roles and next steps so an assessment appeal can be examined fairly and any wider process issue addressed.
Build a short plan–monitor–evaluate routine into subject teaching so learners can check their evidence and improve work before submission.
A practical framework for choosing remote assessment evidence, reviewing concerns fairly and explaining the process to learners.
An AI or similarity indicator is a reason to review evidence, not a finding of misconduct. Use a clear, proportionate process that gives learners a fair chance to respond.
Map each stage of an assessment, name who acts and what evidence they need, then use a fictional resubmission to spot where work stalls.
A short feedback cycle helps learners use comments rather than simply receive them. Try one precise strength, one gap, one manageable action and a follow-up prompt.
Use a clear, human-led process to check document versions, assess evidence, record queries and complete quality checks before releasing marked work.
Bring learning, assessment and your team together in EduMark.
Meet your new workspace
